Skip to Content

The "Job Hoppy" Myth vs College Internships and Contract work

August 10, 2026 by
The "Job Hoppy" Myth vs College Internships and Contract work
matt@mjlrandc.com
| No comments yet

Let's have an honest conversation about a hiring double standard that's costing companies incredible talent.

A candidate applies for a senior IT role. Solid skills. Great references. But their resume shows four different employers in six years — so the recruiter flags them as a "job hopper."

Here's what that recruiter missed: three of those "jobs" were internships during college. One was a contract engagement that ended when the project was complete.

This person didn't hop. They built a career.

Work Has Changed — Has Your Screening Process?

In professional services, IT, and engineering, the nature of work has fundamentally shifted. Project-based engagements, co-ops, and internship rotations aren't red flags anymore — they're modern career development. A candidate who did three internships before graduating isn't unstable; they were exploring, building skills, and making themselves more employable before they even had a full-time title.

When you penalize candidates for internships they took while earning their degree, you're essentially punishing ambition. When you flag a completed contract engagement as instability, you're misreading how a huge portion of the modern workforce actually operates.

Ask a Better Question

The real question isn't "why did they leave?" It's "what did they build while they were there?"

There's a real difference between a candidate who job-hops for a $5,000 bump every 10 months and one who strategically built expertise across multiple environments on purpose. If your hiring process can't tell those two people apart, the problem isn't your candidate pool — it's your process.

What This Costs You

Every strong candidate your screening filters out over a misread resume is a candidate your competitor gets to interview instead. In a market where qualified people already have options, a hiring process built on outdated assumptions about tenure is actively working against you.

*Building a screening process that evaluates what candidates actually did — not just how their resume looks at a glance — is core to how we approach every search. [See how we help set up candidate evaluation frameworks →]*


Sign in to leave a comment
And How It Spreads
Rotten culture rarely starts in the breakroom. It starts in the boardroom — and by the time it's visible to everyone else, it's already been building for a while.